I went to the rich people's Starbucks to study today.
i felt a bit out of place there because i was not wearing an entire paycheck (one of their paychecks, that is) on me in the form of clothing or 'handbags.' nope, torn cargo shorts and smelly sanuks for me!
as i was sitting by the window, this lady pulled up in her p-diddyed (yep, that's a verb - look it up) escalade. beyond the fact that she looked hilarious working so hard showcasing her money, it was hilarious because she sucked really badly at driving. as she parked her blimp, blocking and nearly hitting a b'mer on the way in, i was hoping it was due to talking on her rhinestone-studded iphone like the lady next to me had. nope. she just sucked at driving.
i said to myself, "dang, self, rich people really suck at driving." i kind of laughed again as barbie pranced back to the yugo with a happy cup of starbucks in hand.
man, i really am a terrible person for feeling so much better than poor barbie. i parked my car badly one time, too.
Friday, September 24, 2010
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Salted-caramel, Solid chocolate
![]() |
| From Photostream |
On Friday night we went over to a friend's place to celebrate her birthday and so Sara and I made the cake above. It was awesome. It is a salter-caramel chocolate cake. It even has some kind of special salt - I had no idea that there were so many different kinds of salt out there! We had a good time making it, although I think if we were to make it again/when we make it we will need to invest in a candy thermometer for the caramel to make knowing the temperature a bit easier. We found something online that said you could put it into ice water and then feel the consistency of it, but let's face it - it is a bad thing to allow people like Sara and I to cook something rather specific like that through a guesswork method. Still, it turned out.
Then to follow up on a food weekend, yesterday we stopped at this little hamburger shack on the side of the road and I got an awesome burger. It had avocados and even refried beans and a tostada shell on it (yep, we even make tex-mex hamburgers down here). Like I told Sara, I knew it was going to be a good day when I started it off with a hamburger like that. Then I lost my wallet in the trash can.
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
The Now and Not Yet
On a run this morning after I got off my night float shift, I thought
"I can't wait to go on a run and not have my head sweat" and then thought " I can't wait to go on a run in the middle of winter in shorts and a T-shirt"
I feel like Dallas is a place of I don't like one thing but then liking the opposite things that are only possible because of the first.
Or at work last night thinking "I can't wait until I don't have to FYI page the fellow at 2:30 in the morning about a medical decision I just made that I am completely confident in simply because if I don't wake him up the next morning he'll be upset because I didn't let him know about things going on even if he agreed with the decision I'd made", yet "I am in no way ready to be making my own decisions that no one checks up on being completely accountable for everything I do with no one above me"
Residency is a place of wishing we were at that next step but being scared to death to get there
Such is life. Especially this life Aaron and I seem to be living in blocks of 4 or 5 years at a time always lived in a new location with new friends, new livelihoods, new goals, successes and struggles; trying to enjoy where we are at yet always seeming to look toward the future knowing in x amount of time we will start over. Like living the Christian life in the now and not yet knowing that our life on earth is important as we also look toward life in heaven.
For now I will simply wait for the short term future when I can run without sweating and not walk to my car getting off my night shift at 7:30 am in 85 degree weather. And PS, I seem to think a lot of the blogs I post dwell on this same idea of wrestling with living in the place we are in right now.
"I can't wait to go on a run and not have my head sweat" and then thought " I can't wait to go on a run in the middle of winter in shorts and a T-shirt"
I feel like Dallas is a place of I don't like one thing but then liking the opposite things that are only possible because of the first.
Or at work last night thinking "I can't wait until I don't have to FYI page the fellow at 2:30 in the morning about a medical decision I just made that I am completely confident in simply because if I don't wake him up the next morning he'll be upset because I didn't let him know about things going on even if he agreed with the decision I'd made", yet "I am in no way ready to be making my own decisions that no one checks up on being completely accountable for everything I do with no one above me"
Residency is a place of wishing we were at that next step but being scared to death to get there
Such is life. Especially this life Aaron and I seem to be living in blocks of 4 or 5 years at a time always lived in a new location with new friends, new livelihoods, new goals, successes and struggles; trying to enjoy where we are at yet always seeming to look toward the future knowing in x amount of time we will start over. Like living the Christian life in the now and not yet knowing that our life on earth is important as we also look toward life in heaven.
For now I will simply wait for the short term future when I can run without sweating and not walk to my car getting off my night shift at 7:30 am in 85 degree weather. And PS, I seem to think a lot of the blogs I post dwell on this same idea of wrestling with living in the place we are in right now.
Monday, September 13, 2010
despair and blissful ignorance
When I tell people that I am studying sociology and focusing on the sociology of religion, inevitably there are questions. I usually need to explain to people that no, I am not going to be a pastor when I am done. Other times, somehow the word 'religion' is like a mental block that doesn't allow people to think beyond 'theology,' which ironically is something that we very, very rarely consider. Either way, the conversation usually doesn't stop there.
This makes for interesting bar/happy hour discussions. (This isn't really a new thing for me at bars - ask Sara) Not too long ago we were at the bar with the residents and someone asked me and so we got on the conversation of religion. Seeing as how I like to talk about this stuff, and also seeing as how I have been on an existentialism kick for a bit now, we somehow arrived at Kierkegaard. Ok, I arrive at Kierkegaard. I was talking about his ideas of despair and defining commitments as a way out of the dark, and one of them, trying to take the blank look off his face - i need to figure out how to stop causing that - says, "well, ignorance is bliss." To him, the best line of action is to do all that he can to avoid arriving at the inevitable realization that life apart from a Kierkegaardian defining commitment is submersed in despair.
In earlier generations this would probably seem like an odd conclusion juxtaposed the possibility of realizing one is stuck in despair, but for our generation this is old hat for some reason. Why is this, I wonder, that we prefer to survive though life with a veneer of optimism instead of tearing off the veneer and looking into the face of actually living life? In the past social research consistently showed that going to college could be detrimental to one's belief in the existence of God. People would go to school and be exposed to lots of different view-points and ideas and realize that their own may not be the only one, nor the best one. It can be tantalizing (or paralyzing?) to live in a box and then have the door opened and see a myriad of options. It is like living in the corner store and then going to a super Walmart.
This is not really the case anymore. The secularizing effect that college used to have on students is nearly absent today. One of the reasons for why this is the case is that students today are literally no longer interested in questions of ultimate purpose and existence to the extent that it makes a difference personally. This is interesting to me. Why are we more content to live in despair than otherwise if given the option? More than that, what does optimism really mean if we prefer ignorance? What are we optimistic for in that case?
Do I prefer my box in disregard for world as it is?
This makes for interesting bar/happy hour discussions. (This isn't really a new thing for me at bars - ask Sara) Not too long ago we were at the bar with the residents and someone asked me and so we got on the conversation of religion. Seeing as how I like to talk about this stuff, and also seeing as how I have been on an existentialism kick for a bit now, we somehow arrived at Kierkegaard. Ok, I arrive at Kierkegaard. I was talking about his ideas of despair and defining commitments as a way out of the dark, and one of them, trying to take the blank look off his face - i need to figure out how to stop causing that - says, "well, ignorance is bliss." To him, the best line of action is to do all that he can to avoid arriving at the inevitable realization that life apart from a Kierkegaardian defining commitment is submersed in despair.
In earlier generations this would probably seem like an odd conclusion juxtaposed the possibility of realizing one is stuck in despair, but for our generation this is old hat for some reason. Why is this, I wonder, that we prefer to survive though life with a veneer of optimism instead of tearing off the veneer and looking into the face of actually living life? In the past social research consistently showed that going to college could be detrimental to one's belief in the existence of God. People would go to school and be exposed to lots of different view-points and ideas and realize that their own may not be the only one, nor the best one. It can be tantalizing (or paralyzing?) to live in a box and then have the door opened and see a myriad of options. It is like living in the corner store and then going to a super Walmart.
This is not really the case anymore. The secularizing effect that college used to have on students is nearly absent today. One of the reasons for why this is the case is that students today are literally no longer interested in questions of ultimate purpose and existence to the extent that it makes a difference personally. This is interesting to me. Why are we more content to live in despair than otherwise if given the option? More than that, what does optimism really mean if we prefer ignorance? What are we optimistic for in that case?
Do I prefer my box in disregard for world as it is?
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Invisible.
Phenomenology is, I think, what got me interested in academics. Phenomenology is the study of people and groups that focuses on their psychological states, cognitive dispositions, and how they see the world around them. To put this in another way, it is a study of what world people see. Bracketing the question of what Reality is (that is, with a 'big' R), this is essentially trying to figure out what reality people live in and what it looks like to them. We all have differing views of what this is and as a result, genuinely different experiences of the big 'R' Reality. We don't merely understand our experiences differently, we have different experiences; different realities are taken in.
Now, with that base laid out there (and I can guarantee both that it will likely not be the last time I write about that one and that this is actually going somewhere), I had an interesting conversation last night that got me to thinking a bit. Baylor, like most places, has people who come in and clean the building after people leave for the night. The lady who cleans our (the graduate students) office is a really nice lady who holds three different jobs to 'make it'. I try to talk to her a bit whenever I see her in the hallway or when she comes into the office here to clean up. There are a few other people in the room here that also talk with her, and last night when I got back from working out there was a note for her on the chalk board that they had left to get dinner and that she should come back later to talk.
She and I were talking about the note and she said that it was really nice of us to take the time to talk to her a bit and that it makes her feel appreciated and 'wanted'. I told her that is how she should feel and so we got to talking a bit about how she feels working here at Baylor. She was saying that most people here do not talk to her and most of the time pretend that she is not even there - even when in the same room as her.
Now, I am giving everyone that does not 'see' her the benefit of the doubt and am saying that they are not mean or purposely giving her the distinct impression that they are, as she put it, "better than her." I am thinking that we genuinely live in different words from hers. We live in a world that is distinctly removed from her life, her experiences, and more specifically, the work that she does. So it comes down to invisibility. She is, in a literal way, invisible. Not seen. Not noticed. All three of her jobs are 'service' jobs, and I couldn't help but think that it is ironic that she is invisible to the very people that she serves.
This same idea applies to more than just people, but also to circumstances or situations in our society/world. What do I not see that is and should not be? This is and should be the challenge. To both see and strive to make 'not be.'
Now, with that base laid out there (and I can guarantee both that it will likely not be the last time I write about that one and that this is actually going somewhere), I had an interesting conversation last night that got me to thinking a bit. Baylor, like most places, has people who come in and clean the building after people leave for the night. The lady who cleans our (the graduate students) office is a really nice lady who holds three different jobs to 'make it'. I try to talk to her a bit whenever I see her in the hallway or when she comes into the office here to clean up. There are a few other people in the room here that also talk with her, and last night when I got back from working out there was a note for her on the chalk board that they had left to get dinner and that she should come back later to talk.
She and I were talking about the note and she said that it was really nice of us to take the time to talk to her a bit and that it makes her feel appreciated and 'wanted'. I told her that is how she should feel and so we got to talking a bit about how she feels working here at Baylor. She was saying that most people here do not talk to her and most of the time pretend that she is not even there - even when in the same room as her.
Now, I am giving everyone that does not 'see' her the benefit of the doubt and am saying that they are not mean or purposely giving her the distinct impression that they are, as she put it, "better than her." I am thinking that we genuinely live in different words from hers. We live in a world that is distinctly removed from her life, her experiences, and more specifically, the work that she does. So it comes down to invisibility. She is, in a literal way, invisible. Not seen. Not noticed. All three of her jobs are 'service' jobs, and I couldn't help but think that it is ironic that she is invisible to the very people that she serves.
This same idea applies to more than just people, but also to circumstances or situations in our society/world. What do I not see that is and should not be? This is and should be the challenge. To both see and strive to make 'not be.'
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
